Self-Awareness Matters More Than Self-Discipline  

Some people can thrive under pressure but struggle with simple decisions, routines, or everyday tasks—and for many leaders, that disconnect quietly becomes a source of shame. In this conversation, Dr. J.J. Peterson speaks with therapist and ADHD specialist Isabelle Richards about neurodivergence, self-awareness, and why understanding how you naturally function may matter more than trying to force yourself into systems that were never designed for you.

Prefer to listen? Press play below.

Many leaders are excellent under pressure.

They can navigate crises, make difficult decisions, and carry enormous responsibility without hesitation. They are often the people others turn to when things become complicated, uncertain, or high-stakes.

Yet some of those same leaders quietly struggle with tasks that should feel easy.

They may delay responding to an email, feel overwhelmed by routine decisions, or freeze when trying to begin something simple. They may perform exceptionally well in situations that require urgency while feeling inexplicably stuck in moments that carry far less consequence.

That contradiction can become deeply confusing.

If you can lead a team, solve complex problems, and perform under pressure, why do certain ordinary tasks feel disproportionately hard?

For many high achievers, that disconnect becomes a private source of frustration. It often gets interpreted as inconsistency, lack of discipline, or some personal failure to function the “right” way.

In his conversation with licensed therapist and ADHD specialist Isabelle Richards, co-host of the Something Shiny ADHD Podcast, Dr. J.J. Peterson explores that tension through the lens of neurodivergence, leadership, and self-awareness.

Rather than focusing on productivity hacks or rigid systems, the conversation asks a deeper question: what happens when leaders stop interpreting struggle as proof that something is wrong with them, and begin seeing it as information about how they naturally function?

Why Leadership Struggles Are Often Mistaken for Discipline Problems

Many leaders assume that difficulty means they need to try harder. When something feels hard, the instinct is often to become more disciplined, more organized, more structured, or more productive.

That response makes sense. Leadership culture often reinforces the belief that successful people should be able to push through discomfort and operate consistently across every environment.

But Isabelle offers a different framework.

Rather than seeing ADHD or neurodivergence as something broken, she reframes it as a different operating system.

She often uses the term “neuro-spicy” to describe brains that process the world differently.

These include ADHD, autism, sensory processing differences, executive functioning challenges, OCD, dyslexia, and other forms of neurodivergence.

Many of these experiences are connected to executive functioning—the mental skills responsible for planning, prioritizing, sequencing, organization, and decision-making.

Her perspective is not that these differences need to be fixed, but that they need to be understood.

As she explains:

“It’s not fixing or curing your brain and nervous system… it’s repairing all the wounds you’ve suffered because you thought you were supposed to be different than how you really are.”

That distinction matters—especially in leadership.

Leadership culture often rewards consistency, speed, decisiveness, and emotional regulation, and many workplaces are built around the assumption that everyone processes information in the same way.

But people don’t.

When leaders assume they should function like everyone else, struggle quickly turns into shame.

Why Some People Thrive Under Pressure but Freeze Everywhere Else

One of the most compelling insights from Isabelle is that many ADHD brains function differently when urgency, excitement, or pressure are present.

In moments of high stimulation, the brain receives a flood of adrenaline and dopamine.

That means some people can suddenly focus, act decisively, and perform at a high level when stakes are high.

But when those external drivers disappear, everyday tasks can feel overwhelming.

This creates a confusing contradiction that many leaders quietly live with.

You may be able to lead a crisis meeting without hesitation, yet avoid responding to an email for days. You may feel comfortable making major business decisions while struggling to choose what to eat for lunch. You may manage a team effectively while feeling overwhelmed by organizing your own workflow.

Without context, those inconsistencies can feel deeply personal. Many people assume the problem is laziness, lack of focus, or a failure of discipline.

The conclusion often becomes: something must be wrong with me.

That assumption often leads to cycles of self-criticism.

Isabelle explains that shame itself can become reinforcing because it creates physiological activation. Shame produces adrenaline, and adrenaline creates dopamine.

For some neurodivergent brains, that can create a strange loop where stress and shame become motivating—even while causing emotional damage.

“We are the best at shaming ourselves,” Isabelle says. “The shame spirals we go on are not light.”

That insight reframes what many leaders mistake for laziness, inconsistency, or lack of discipline.

But Isabelle also offers an important counterbalance to shame.

Rather than trying to eliminate it entirely, she explains that shame may be meeting a need the brain is already seeking.

Because shame creates adrenaline—and adrenaline can produce dopamine—it can become a strangely effective source of stimulation for an ADHD brain.

That doesn’t make shame healthy, but it does explain why some people return to it so quickly.

In the conversation, Isabelle suggests a different pathway: specific gratitude.

Not generic positivity. Not forced optimism.

Instead, she describes gratitude tied directly to the moment you are in.

A person might pause and acknowledge that they are grateful to understand what is happening, grateful to recognize a pattern, or grateful to realize they need support instead of punishment.

The goal is not to pretend struggle doesn’t exist.

It is to give the brain another source of reinforcement.

Over time, gratitude can begin creating a healthier reward pathway—one that offers the stimulation the brain may be seeking without relying on self-criticism to get there.

For leaders, this becomes less about “thinking positively” and more about interrupting the automatic move toward shame.

It matters because shame often disguises itself as productivity, perfectionism, or over-functioning. Many leaders push harder not because it helps, but because pressure has become the only way they know how to create momentum.

Sometimes the problem is not motivation.

It is misunderstanding.

Self-Awareness Is Not the Same as Self-Criticism

One of the most important ideas from the conversation is Isabelle’s concept of “meta-awareness.” Rather than simply noticing what you do, meta-awareness is the ability to understand why you do it.

It’s the difference between saying, “I struggle with this task,” and asking, “What conditions make this task harder for me?”

That shift matters because it moves people out of judgment and into observation.

For some, that may look like recognizing they make better decisions later in the day. For others, it may mean realizing meetings drain energy more than writing, or that too many choices at once create overwhelm.

Meta-awareness is not about labeling yourself or putting limits on what you can do. It’s about gathering information. The more you understand your own patterns, the easier it becomes to stop interpreting friction as personal failure.

And that becomes a leadership skill. Leaders who understand themselves often become more capable of understanding others.

Accommodation Is Not Weakness

One of the strongest ideas that emerges from the conversation is how accommodations are framed.

For many people, the word sounds clinical or formal, something reserved for workplaces or medical conversations. But Isabelle and JJ describe accommodations in a much more human way.

An accommodation is simply a way of helping yourself function well.

JJ shares a small but meaningful example: preparing coffee the night before. Not because he cannot make coffee, but because reducing morning decisions creates ease. He describes it as “night JJ taking care of morning JJ.”

That reframing matters because it removes shame from the equation. Accommodation is not proof that you are incapable. It is evidence that you understand what supports you.

Leaders often encourage accommodations for teams through flexible schedules, walking meetings, visual planning, or clearer expectations. Yet many struggle to extend that same care to themselves.

If you want to better understand what accommodations may help you function more effectively, Isabelle Richards created the ADHD Focus & Flow Finder—a tool designed to help people identify what supports attention, energy, and productivity in practical ways.

👉 Download the ADHD Focus & Flow Finder

Leadership Was Never Meant to Be One-Size-Fits-All

This idea of alignment extends beyond neurodivergence.

In an earlier conversation with strategist Macy Robison, Dr. J.J. Peterson explored how many people struggle because they are trying to force themselves into methods that do not match how they naturally communicate.

The tension is remarkably similar.

When your method does not align with how you naturally function, things begin to feel harder than they should.

That applies to content.

And it applies to leadership.

If the connection between alignment, self-awareness, and how we naturally function resonates, this related exploration on communication style and resonance offers another perspective on why forcing yourself into the wrong method often creates friction:

👉 Explore the conversation on communication, alignment, and why some strategies never quite feel natural

Both conversations point toward the same truth:

The problem may not be that you need to become someone else.

The problem may be that you have never been given permission to understand yourself.

The Best Leaders Understand Themselves First

Leadership is often framed around influence, communication, confidence, and decision-making. Those qualities matter, but self-awareness may be the skill underneath all of them.

Leaders who understand themselves tend to recognize what environments help them thrive. They become better at building systems that reduce unnecessary friction, creating psychologically safe spaces for others, and noticing when team members may be masking or struggling.

They also become less likely to reward sameness over effectiveness.

Perhaps most importantly, self-aware leaders become less reactive to their own limitations. Instead of interpreting struggle as weakness, they become more curious about what support or structure may be needed.

That shift doesn’t just improve leadership performance. It changes how people experience work and how teams learn to function together.

A Different Kind of Leadership Question

Most leaders ask:

“How do I become more disciplined?”

But a better question might be:

“How do I work best?”

Because understanding yourself isn’t indulgent. It’s strategic.

And it may be one of the most overlooked leadership skills there is.

If this idea resonates, explore more of Isabelle Richards’ work through the Something Shiny ADHD Podcast, where she and co-host David Kessler share conversations about neurodivergence, self-understanding, relationships, and executive functioning.

👉 Explore the Something Shiny Podcast

When people stop fighting the way they naturally function, they often discover they were never the problem to begin with.

Previous
Previous

Building Visibility Without Becoming Performative

Next
Next

What Makes an Experience Feel Worth It